Article View: sci.space
Article #15Re: Clinton's bad posting etiquette
From: Eric Loeb
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:45
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 10:45
12 lines
904 bytes
904 bytes
> We did finally get an apology for bad posting etiquette, even if it wasn't the > most polite I've ever seen (could be that the people mentioned deserved it > though). That is the case. I should have cooled of before writing the note, but thank you for reading between the lines. I am sure most readers of this group are extremely intelligent, rational, calm, thoughtful, dedicated scientists who have no wish nor need to prop up their egos with unwarrented verbal violence. Eric Loeb
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30107@life.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!ai.mit.edu!loebReferences:
<30060@life.ai.mit.edu> <Bwr62u.Gq3@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!ai.mit.edu!loeb From: loeb@ai.mit.edu (Eric Loeb) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Clinton's bad posting etiquette Message-ID: <30107@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: 27 Oct 92 10:45:42 GMT References: <30060@life.ai.mit.edu> <Bwr62u.Gq3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@ai.mit.edu Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Lines: 12