Article View: sci.space
Article #194Re: Comet Collision
From: amon
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 14:56
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 14:56
50 lines
2905 bytes
2905 bytes
> limitingly?) how quickly any given researcher can think of a new idea. > Thus until we have strong AI, the exponential _cannot_ become > `essentially vertical'. Sure, it'll get steeper, but not indefinitely. > I'll not get into a long argument on things that neither of us can prove, and besides it'll be 2020 in no time at all and we'll find out. Whether 2020 or 2030 or 2040 is not so much the point. I'd say you are doing exactly the linear extrapolation I mentioned. What if there are other routes to "strong AI"? What if we just simply use that technology that can build things out of atoms and duplicate a brain or a portion of a brain, but do it in silicon or germanium equivalents to the nuerons? I'm not claiming that particular approach will or won't work. I'm saying that the indicators of knowledge growth are stable and that I personally believe they tell us something very profound about the interactions between areas of knowledge. Whether or not it is by a method which our poor 1990's hugging imaginations can come up with, I think the curve will continue and will be accomplished by some means. I am not going to pretend to be able to do more than take a WAG (Wild Ass Guess) at exactly how it will come about. If one route gets slowed down by ThisThatOrTheOther Activists, it will just force the tide to bypass the obstacle such that it will blind side them, come in from an unexpected direction. Stopping the tidal wave of growing knowledge is like trying to stop a river. No matter how high you build the dam, the water will eventually overflow it or find a way around it ... and sometimes with truly disastrous results. Results far worse than just letting the river flow, or maybe shifting its direction just the tiniest wee bit. Personally I'd much rather ride the crest to the end ... hopefully not like the surfer in "Lucifer's Hammer", but better there than underneath the wave... I'll put a steak dinner on it. Vertical by no later than 2030. If I win, I'll even let you make it on the planet of your choice Nick. (Haines, not Szabo!) Hopefully medical science will be advancing quickly enough to make sure we're both there for the finale. I've made my cryonics arrangements though, just in case...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bx1LJ0.HBB.1@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!amon@elegabalus.cs.qub.ac.ukShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!amon@elegabalus.cs.qub.ac.uk From: amon@elegabalus.cs.qub.ac.uk Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Comet Collision Message-ID: <Bx1LJ0.HBB.1@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 1 Nov 92 14:56:46 GMT Article-I.D.: cs.Bx1LJ0.HBB.1 Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu Distribution: sci Organization: [via International Space University] Lines: 50 Approved: bboard-news_gateway X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU