Article View: sci.space
Article #206Re: NASA Coverup
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 03:18
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 03:18
22 lines
1473 bytes
1473 bytes
In article <4578@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes:
> NASA physicists..... YOU ARE withholding the truth from the American
> People...
Oh, come now. A conspiracy that large, held together for that long? In
a government that couldn't suppress Watergate or Iranscam? Come now.
This is laughable.
I also note that the conspiracy must extend to Japan, since their first
near-Moon navigation efforts, for Hiten, worked flawlessly.
>If you want to argue about the merits of my calculations...
What merits? Just for starters, your calculations assume that the Earth
and Moon are motionless with respect to each other. This will not yield
physically meaningful answers; the Moon's orbital motion (and thus that
of the neutral point) is *not* negligible. Indeed, you get a better first
approximation for lunar trajectories by assuming that the Moon's mass is
zero than by assuming that its velocity is zero.
--
MS-DOS is the OS/360 of the 1980s. | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
-Hal W. Hardenbergh (1985)| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bx2JuJ.1A@zoo.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henryReferences:
<4578@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space,alt.conspiracy Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: NASA Coverup Message-ID: <Bx2JuJ.1A@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 03:18:18 GMT References: <4578@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 22