Article View: sci.space
Article #227NASA Coverup
From: snarfy
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:35
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 08:35
46 lines
2582 bytes
2582 bytes
snarfy charges,
>> NASA physicists..... YOU ARE withholding the truth from the American
>> People...
In message-ID: <Bx2JuJ.1A@zoo.toronto.edu> (Henry Spencer) responds:
>Oh, come now. A conspiracy that large, held together for that long? In
>a government that couldn't suppress Watergate or Iranscam? Come now.
>This is laughable.
You must think that what you see on TV news is the entirety of what
really is going on in the world . Now some might find such naivete'
laughable, but I actually feel sorry for you.
Watergate and Iranscam are the tips of some very large icebergs. Some of
us have a difficult time figuring out why ,now that the "cold war " is
supposedly over, we need to have a National Security Agency in charge of
keeping an estimated 8 million secrets from the American public. What ,in
principle ,is to be gained by keeping the JFK Assasination files closed
until well into the next century, when all the likely participants in
this disgusting political takeover will have died of old age? I am not
the first to make such allegations about the moon landing charade,
therefore , suppression is attempted but fails.
>I also note that the conspiracy must extend to Japan, since their first
>near-Moon navigation efforts, for Hiten, worked flawlessly.
The issue is not necessarily whether we landed on the moon , but how we
did it. The Japanese have this knack for doing anything we can do , and
with better quality and precision.
>>If you want to argue about the merits of my calculations...
>What merits? Just for starters, your calculations assume that the Earth
>and Moon are motionless with respect to each other.
No they don't . Abell's lunar gravity figure of 1/6 assumes the earth
and moon rotate around a common barycenter. The neutral point figure is
a direct derivation of that result.
My calculations assume the neutral point to be motionless with respect
to the earth and moon . What do your calculations assume?
snarfy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4581@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfy From: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Newsgroups: sci.space,alt.conspiracy Subject: NASA Coverup Keywords: Naivete' Ideas Laughable Message-ID: <4581@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 92 00:35:57 PST Sender: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Reply-To: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Lines: 48