Article View: sci.space
Article #308Re: NASA COVERUP
From: Steve Linton
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:10
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:10
9 lines
1062 bytes
1062 bytes
The most likely explanation is that the definition of neutral point has changed, perhaps from a stationary geocentric frame of reference to a rotating frams locked to Earth and Moon, oir perhaps in some other way. In this, as in most other fields of science, notations and definitions do change with time, and often vary between authors as well. The incidental evidence that the Moon's surface gravity is roughly 1/6 of that of the Earth is overwhelming, and that for the inverse-square law of gravity even more so. Also, what would be the motivation of this supposd conspiracy?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov5.001014.20569@infodev.cam.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!camcus!sl25References:
<6583.309.uupcb@thcave.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!camcus!sl25 From: sl25@cus.cam.ac.uk (Steve Linton) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: NASA COVERUP Message-ID: <1992Nov5.001014.20569@infodev.cam.ac.uk> Date: 5 Nov 92 00:10:14 GMT References: <6583.309.uupcb@thcave.no> Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news) Organization: U of Cambridge, England Lines: 9 Nntp-Posting-Host: bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk