Article View: sci.space
Article #317Re: NASA Coverup
From: phoenix.Princeton.EDUcarlosn Car...
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:29
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:29
56 lines
3529 bytes
3529 bytes
In article <4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes: > > > Well , it sounds like the willingness to cling to some kind of la-la > land belief that our government wouldn't lie to us about the moon > landings won't just melt in the face of straightforward ,elementary > mathematics ,and piles of circumstantial evidence. I guess I'll just have > to use even bigger piles of circumstantial evidence and MORE math. Here > goes: > [stuff about astros not moving as much as 1/6 g might have permitted] I just find it hard to believe, that a cover up that was so good as to fool _all_ the media could have been carried out. But regardless of this, consider the very good quality pictures we got back from the moon... Isn't it kind of weird, that although the government was able to provide great realistic pictures, they would not spend the extra bucks for some real low g effects? The movie _2001_ had some pretty realistic 0g, but the U.S. government could not afford it for a massive cover up ?!?! > During Apollo 17 , astronauts Cernan and Scmitt began their first > assignment by deploying and loading the Rover . Cernan apparently became > quite excited and his Capsule Communicator , astronaut Parker warned him > that his metabolic rate was going up. That meant that he was using more > oxygen. Cernan replied that he never felt calmer in his life and > indicated to Parker that he would take it easy . He mentioned to Parker > that he thought that it was due to getting accustomed to handling himself > in "zero g". > > Parker, an astronomer, then stated that he thought Cernan was working at > 1/6 gravity. Cernan's reply was "Yes. You know where we are....whatever." > This remark suggests that Cernan wanted to avoid the discussion. Perhaps > Parker was not aware of the high gravity situation and asked an > embarrassing question. > All that you needed to avoid this problem was some quick editing! Made for TV movies are better at catching dumb errors like these! In addition there is also the questions: - Why has noone in _authority_ ever spilled his beans - You think the gov can trust all of Congress (and its staffers) to keep quiet? - If Congress didn't know about the cover up where did the $$$ go? - Soviets would have made _VERY_ sure the whole world new about the fake, after all they could easily have told if transmissions were comming from the moon! _ You really think that Nixon thought this was so important as to go through a whole other cover up :) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Carlos G. Niederstrasser | It is difficult to say what | | Princeton Planetary Society | is impossible; for the dream of | | | yesterday, is the hope of today |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov5.002905.28793@Princeton.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!princeton!palette.Princeton.EDU!carlosnReferences:
<4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!princeton!palette.Princeton.EDU!carlosn From: phoenix.Princeton.EDU!carlosn (Carlos G. Niederstrasser) Subject: Re: NASA Coverup Message-ID: <1992Nov5.002905.28793@Princeton.EDU> Originator: news@nimaster Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: palette.princeton.edu Organization: Princeton University References: <4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 00:29:05 GMT Lines: 56