Article View: sci.space
Article #321Re: NASA Coverup
From: Ian Matthew Burrell
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 01:19
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 01:19
75 lines
4897 bytes
4897 bytes
This post will attempt to completely destroy the allegation that the government is hiding some undefined fact about the Moon's mass or density. For, if what a you say is true, the Moon must have much different mass than accepted. First some numbers: Mass of the Earth: 5.98 x 10^24 kg Radius of Earth: 6.37 x 10^6 m or 6370 km Mass of Moon: 7.34 x 10^22 kg Radius of Moon: 1.74 x 10^6 m or 1740 km Distance from Moon to Earth: 3.84 x 10^8 m or 384,000 km Using the equation from Newton's Law of Gravitation, a = (G*M)/R^2, the acceleration due to gravity at the Earth's surface is 9.8 m/s^2 (1G) which is a undeniable physical fact. The acceleration at the Moon's surface is 1.62 m/s^2 which is approximately 0.165 G or 1/6 G. The barycenter, the point which the Earth and Moon revolve around is the center of mass of the system. It is (m*d)/(M+m) from the center of the Earth. That is 4656 km from the center of the Earth, or almost 380,000 km from the center of the Moon. The barycenter is well inside the Earth. However, the Earth-Moon system does have a noticeable wobble to it since the masses are so close inside. Neglecting rotation, etc., the point where the gravity from each body cancels, is solved by setting the forces equal and solving. I found that the "neutral" point (which has little meaning in the real rotating system) is roughly the same distance from the center of the Moon as the center of mass is from the Earth's center. However, this calculation is fairly complicated and my answer is suspect. BTW, the density of the Earth is 5523 kg/m^3 (or 5.52 g/cm^3, about five times the density of water). The density of the Moon is 3308 kg/m^3 or three times the density of water. If we use your suspect value of the gravity of the Moon's surface being .64G, then the mass of the Moon must be 2.86 x 10^23 kg or one twentieth of the Earth's mass or four times the Moon's present mass. This would be manifested in a much different barycenter for the Earth-Moon system. The density of the Moon would be twelve times the density of water, much heavier than rock or metal, approaching the density of lead or gold. The fact is, astronomers can determine the mass of the Moon using a variety of techniques, which are extremely accurate and do not require getting anywhere near the moon. For example, astronomers can inaccurately determine the mass of stars light years away! The tides also offer a qualitative reason why we can guess at the Moon's mass. Also, there is a large body of PUBLIC DOMAIN info. from the lunar "landers" and orbiters which would prove the true value. There are probably books with the gravitational calculations and the info. on suits, acrobatics, and the history of the failed probes. The failure of the early lunar probes can be explained by inaccuracy in measurements (navigation requires very high precision), possible neglect of other factors such as the Earth and Sun's effects, bad equipment, or many other problems that early missions had to work out. Just a small error at the beginning of the mission could result in a large discrepancy at the end. Something as basic as the Moon's mass or gravity cannot be kept secret from anyone with a pad of paper, a telescope could figure it out, and a desire to know. Why would the U.S., Russia, Japan, most other space-faring nations, and literally thousands of scientists and engineers not in NASA but other public and private organizations keep this secret. Scientists and engineers tend to be bad at keeping secrets, especially this big and widespread. The recent point of space suits and lack of athletic ability of lunar astronauts is interesting but false. First, astronauts were probably prohibited from acrobatics because of the very high possibility of injury (or death) if the fouled up in the clumsy suits and unfamiliar environment. Second, although the gravity is lower, the inertia is still the same. Third, those suits are unmaneuverable, and probably not designed for any vertical leaping. Movies/photos of lunar astronauts showing them adopting a leaping gait, only possible on the Moon. Also, those old suits are heavy, just how heavy I don't know. Finally, some minor flames: What exactly is NASA covering-up and why? Ian Burrell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov5.011919.18158@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsReferences:
<4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: iburrell@leland.Stanford.EDU (Ian Matthew Burrell) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: NASA Coverup Message-ID: <1992Nov5.011919.18158@leland.Stanford.EDU> Date: 5 Nov 92 01:19:19 GMT References: <4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: DSO, Stanford University Lines: 75