Article View: sci.space
Article #353Re: Apollo 8, 9, and 10
From: Ralf Brown
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1989 17:24
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1989 17:24
18 lines
1526 bytes
1526 bytes
In article <17231@bellcore.bellcore.com> ddavey@grits.UUCP (Doug Davey) writes:
}Does anybody remember whether the ascent or descent engine was used
}during Apollo 10's return from low orbit to rendezvous with the CSM?
}Either option seems difficult. On the one hand, I would not expect
}the descent engine to be restartable. On the other, firing the
}ascent engine and getting the ascent stage cleanly separated from the
}descent stage would be tricky since the descent stage was deigned to
}be firmly on the lunar surface during this operation.
As I recall, one contingency plan was in fact such a separation while not
on the surface, in case they ran out of fuel trying to land. They would
then separate immediately and use the ascent stage to abort back to the
CSM.
--
{backbone}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf ARPA: RALF@CS.CMU.EDU FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/46
BITnet: RALF%CS.CMU.EDU@CMUCCVMA AT&Tnet: (412)268-3053 (school) FAX: ask
DISCLAIMER? Did |"Let both sides invoke the wonders of science instead of
I claim something?| the terrors." --John F. Kennedy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5574@pt.cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralfReferences:
<377@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1989Jul19.005449.3163@utzoo.uucp> <17231@bellcore.bellcore.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!ralf From: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu (Ralf Brown) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Apollo 8, 9, and 10 Message-ID: <5574@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Date: 19 Jul 89 17:24:25 GMT References: <377@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <1989Jul19.005449.3163@utzoo.uucp> <17231@bellcore.bellcore.com> Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 18