Article View: sci.space
Article #6334Re: EVA costs
From: begley
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:48
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:48
19 lines
1525 bytes
1525 bytes
In article <BzFxGA.xC.1@cs.cmu.edu> roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) writes: >While it wouldn't be fair to divide the cost of an entire Shuttle mission >by maximum EVA time to get US EVA costs, I expect a more reasonable >accounting method would still get a figure up in the millions of dollars >per hour. Don't the EVA suits have a certain maximum number of hours they >can be used per flight? >John Roberts >roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov > The suits have about 7 hours of oxygen in their primary O2 tanks, and about the same amount in their secondary tanks under normal use conditions. But since the secondary tanks are meant to serve as a supplement should the suit get a leak or the primary system fail, this does not give the astronaut 14 hours of oxygen. The real limiting consumable is battery life, about 8 hours. But this limit is for each EVA. Once the suits are hooked up to the orbiter, the oxygen, water, and batteries are filled and recharged. (The secondary O2 tanks are not rechargable because they have 3 times the pressure as the primary tanks.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec18.144817.17022@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!newsReferences:
<BzFxGA.xC.1@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!news From: begley@l14h13.jsc.nasa.gov Subject: Re: EVA costs Message-ID: <1992Dec18.144817.17022@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System) Organization: Lockheed Engineering and Sciences References: <BzFxGA.xC.1@cs.cmu.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:48:17 GMT Lines: 22