Article View: sci.space
Article #6372Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)
From: Gary Coffman
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 00:25
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 00:25
37 lines
2492 bytes
2492 bytes
In article <1992Dec22.160715.28828@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes: >In article <71877@cup.portal.com> BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) writes: > >>>NASA spends over a billion dollars on each Space Shuttle flight. I think >>>you've indulged in some creative accounting. > >> The Space Transportation budget this year was about $5 billion, if >> memory serves. NASA flew 8 Shuttle missions this year. > >This number does not include NASA overhead, amortization of the orbiter, >amortization of Shuttle development costs, and a host of other costs. Adding >those in puts the cost at well over a billion per flight. Hell, interest >costs on development alone adds over a quarter billion per flight (BTW, >this interest is not a sunk cost since it is part of the national debt and >we are paying for it even now). > >>You have done the 'creative accounting' here, I'd say. > >No, it's NASA who is being creative by ignoring billions in cost. BTW, >if a private company ran their books the way NASA does they would be >thrown in jail for fraud. This is a tired argument. NASA is not a private company, is not chartered to work like a private company, and is tasked with missions no private company will undertake. It's customer is the US taxpayer and that customer wanted R&D work done on a reusable Shuttle. NASA did it, and the customer paid for it. Now the customer wants payloads launched into space using existing hardware, NASA does it, and the customer pays for it. The customer's Mastercard balance doesn't enter into the equation unless he defaults payment. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec25.002522.4127@ke4zv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!garyReferences:
<1992Dec16.102412.27942@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.724533084@convex.convex.com> <71877@cup.portal.com> <1992Dec22.160715.28828@iti.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...) Message-ID: <1992Dec25.002522.4127@ke4zv.uucp> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) Organization: Destructive Testing Systems References: <1992Dec16.102412.27942@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.724533084@convex.convex.com> <71877@cup.portal.com> <1992Dec22.160715.28828@iti.org> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 00:25:22 GMT Lines: 37