🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6391

Re: DC vs Shuttle capabilities

#6391
From: Greg Moore
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:52
55 lines
2596 bytes
In article <ewright.724705324@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <pgm2hxr@rpi.edu> strider@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Greg Moore) writes:
>
>>	Gee, thanks for the snide answer.  Now, my original point was
>>on rendezvous and repair.  So, now we have to get 3 objects in close
>>proximity to each other.  You've just made the problem at least 50%
>>tougher.  And now you have to transfer between craft.  More 
>>difficuly.
>
>Last time I flew back into DFW, I saw more than three planes on
>the ground, in close proximity to one another.  I saw people and
>baggage being transferred between flights.   Looks do-able.
>
	Umm, so?  Tell me, did you see 3 aircraft landing at the same
time, or flying in formation?  Did you see baggage transferred between
them while in flight?  I'm not talking about on the ground, I'm talking
about in space.  If you recall, my original comment was about in-flight
satellite repair.

>
>>>That's what tankers are for.
>
>>	Again, another craft.
>
>I saw a *lot* of airplanes at DFW.
>
	Ayup.  And the US Air Force is the ONLY one that regularly does
inflight air-refueling.  I haven't seen Delta or Virgin Atlantic do it.
Remember, again, we are talking about in-orbit, not on the ground.

>
>>	Hint, they are flying.  You are talking about a paper=airplane
>>and saying it will do all this and more.  I'm saying, build it, fly it,
>>and see what happens.
>
>I thought that was what we were doing.
>
	No, some people are telling me, DC-1 will do this, do that, and
hey, we can add this, we can add that... it's all going to be easy.
I'ms aying, "sounds good, but prove it."

>
>>	Right, that works fine once you've built your power-plant
>>on the moon.  I'm talking at first.  It seems to me that someone
>>here is forgetting the middle step of testing and flying the thing.
>
>See above.
>
	IBID.

>There's a difference between "testing and flying the thing"
>and standing on the sidelines hurling spitballs.
>
	And there's a difference between making snide comments, and
trying to temper enthusiasm with reality.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <b-p254n@rpi.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!clotho.acm.rpi.edu!strider
References: <ewright.724354656@convex.convex.com> <pgm2hxr@rpi.edu> <ewright.724705324@convex.convex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!clotho.acm.rpi.edu!strider
From: strider@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Greg Moore)
Subject: Re: DC vs Shuttle capabilities
Message-ID: <b-p254n@rpi.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: acm.rpi.edu
Organization: The Voice of Fate
References: <ewright.724354656@convex.convex.com> <pgm2hxr@rpi.edu> <ewright.724705324@convex.convex.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:52:41 GMT
Lines: 58