Article View: sci.space
Article #6433Re: Aurora chase planes (was Re: Aurora)
From: Mary Shafer
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 06:41
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 06:41
35 lines
2678 bytes
2678 bytes
On Fri, 25 Dec 1992 20:02:03 GMT, henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) said: HS> In article <SHAFER.92Dec23221311@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov> shafer@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer) writes: >... Remember that flight test, including the chasing, is >only done by test organizations; operational squadrons (the people who >routinely fly with weapons) are only rarely involved. Dryden, for >example, has absolutely no weapons... HS> A side issue here is that many people don't understand that weapons are HS> *dangerous*. Contrary to what you might think from half-baked war movies, HS> properly-trained troops treat even hand grenades with great respect and HS> considerable caution. Live missiles are dangerous to handle, dangerous HS> to carry, dangerous to have around. Even *storing* them safely takes HS> care and effort. Aircraft don't fly armed without good reason. Excellent point, Henry. You can't even walk in front of an armed airplane once the streamers have been pulled at the Hot Gun Line. All the ordnance (missiles and rounds for the cannon) are stored in bunkers, quite a ways from everything else here at Edwards AFB. I understand that there is quite a series of checks before live weapons ever even get to the aircraft and I know that there are elaborate precautions taken when they're on the aircraft. For example, you don't just pin the missile and taxi the aircraft back to your ramp for the night--you unload it, store it overnight, and them put it back on the airplane the next day. (I should mention that the precautions may be different at operational bases; AFFTC, being a test organization, may be more cautious than, say, a TAC base, but I suspect that the differences are minor.) -- Mary Shafer DoD #0362 KotFR NASA Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, CA shafer@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov Of course I don't speak for NASA "A MiG at your six is better than no MiG at all." Unknown US fighter pilot
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SHAFER.92Dec25224150@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!news.dfrf.nasa.gov!shaferReferences:
<Bzo1Fv.MD0.1@cs.cmu.edu> <SHAFER.92Dec22074730@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov> <1h8beqINN9hv@news.cerf.net> <1992Dec23.194205.17821@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <SHAFER.92Dec23221311@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov> <BztznG.4K0@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!news.dfrf.nasa.gov!shafer From: shafer@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer) Subject: Re: Aurora chase planes (was Re: Aurora) In-Reply-To: henry@zoo.toronto.edu's message of Fri, 25 Dec 1992 20:02:03 GMT Message-ID: <SHAFER.92Dec25224150@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov> Sender: news@news.dfrf.nasa.gov (Usenet news) Organization: NASA Dryden, Edwards, Cal. References: <Bzo1Fv.MD0.1@cs.cmu.edu> <SHAFER.92Dec22074730@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov> <1h8beqINN9hv@news.cerf.net> <1992Dec23.194205.17821@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <SHAFER.92Dec23221311@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov> <BztznG.4K0@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 06:41:53 GMT Lines: 35