Article View: sci.space
Article #6445Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX?
From: Allen W. Sherzer
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 19:56
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 19:56
71 lines
3535 bytes
3535 bytes
In article <23DEC199220375318@judy.uh.edu> wingo%cspara.decnet@Fedex.Msfc.Nasa.gov writes: >>The fact remains however that we did spend $34 billion to develop Shuttle... >The numbers that I have seen from the Congressional budget office are 8.8 >billion dollars in 1974 dollars. Are you saying that we have had 400 percent >inflation from 74 to 86? 400% is only two doublings which would be about right given 70's inflation. I also have no idea what the CBO included or didn't include in the estimate. >No what I said was that only if you included every single item that could >possibly related to *any* US manned space program, would you get a number >greater than 500 million dollars. This is what Pike did. Ah but Pike, doing what you describe above, came to a figure of about $750M per flight. You are distorting what Pike said. The $500M per flight is confirmed by NASA AND the Aldridge Commission. What is it that you know which they don't? >A great portion >of these costs would be there no matter what system it is that is flying Then charge them accordingly. >men in space. This includes maintaining the test stands at Marshall and at >Stennis and at Edwards and at Simi valley where the RL-10's are tested. Since all RL-10 variants in the past 10 years have been paid for with private funds, I'm sure they paid for their use of test facilities. >This also includes the hangers at 501 Bolsa Avenue >in Huntington Beach (McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Plant) where the >DC would be built. DC is being developed by SDIO, not NASA. It wouldn't have shown up in Pike's analysis. Please be honest Dennis. >>I just looked up the exact numbers. At 10 flights per year (roughly 80% >>the US MLV market) a DC-1 should (if it works) cost $2700 per pound. This >>is a third the cost of Shuttle and about 25% less than existing expendables. >>If flight rate goes to 12 a year then costs drop to about $2300 per pound. >>This assumes a $3B (twice McD's estimate) DDT&E cost over 10 years. >Allen did you include the $9.9 billion dollar (1960 dollar) cost of the >development of the Titan? Did Boeing amortize the development costs of the MD-11 as part of the 767? Your question has about the same level of meaning. >Creative accounting does wonders when you sin by omission. As for some earlier >commets of your about the shuttle being at maximum flight rate, it is obvious >that NASA can launch one per month. I have stated my criteria before. When they can do it for two years then I'll accept it. >Also for your comment that the Shuttle can't handle more than 50 launches, I >would love to hear your references for that. Since I didn't say that I can't give you a reference. Allen -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves | | aws@iti.org | nothing undone" | +----------------------119 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec26.195623.29522@iti.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!awsReferences:
<STEINLY.92Dec23121415@topaz.ucsc.edu> <1992Dec23.212100.18194@iti.org> <23DEC199220375318@judy.uh.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? Message-ID: <1992Dec26.195623.29522@iti.org> Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow References: <STEINLY.92Dec23121415@topaz.ucsc.edu> <1992Dec23.212100.18194@iti.org> <23DEC199220375318@judy.uh.edu> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 19:56:23 GMT Lines: 71