Article View: sci.space
Article #6449Re: ASTM, Saturn and MOL (Was Re: MOL)
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 23:12
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 23:12
49 lines
3135 bytes
3135 bytes
>In article <23DEC199220530775@judy.uh.edu> wingo%cspara.decnet@Fedex.Msfc.Nasa
.
>Gov writes:
>>>...The third stage (S-V) was to have been powered by 2 RL-10
>>>engines. The S-V was NOT Centaur...
>>
>>I can buy the four engines and 6 engine bit, but according to document I
>>have found here and the Book "Rocket Scientist" and Medaris's " Cound down
>>to Decision" These were desginated the Centaur, although I will go back and
>>look and make sure of this just in case.
>
>Stages To Saturn, NASA SP-4206, says specifically that the original S-V
>stage was to be a Centaur. It was slated to be the third stage of the
>Saturn C-1 and the fourth stage of Saturn C-2 (which used the S-IV as
>its third stage and was to have a new second stage). (The Saturn C-3
>moved things up one more stage, with the S-IV as fourth stage, the
>C-2's second stage as third stage, and another new second stage.)
>
>Incidentally, it's important to understand that (a) there were a lot
>of Saturn designs proposed -- the same study that nailed down the C-1-2-3
>scheme also recomended against proceeding with the Saturn A-1, A-2, and
>B-1, and those were only the most promising survivors from a longer list --
>and (b) the same name sometimes got re-used (there were at least three
>different vehicles named "Saturn C-3" at various times).
>
>>>The 'C' designation was dropped somewhere along the way, with the Saturn C-1
>>>becoming simply Saturn 1...
>>
>>According to Dr. Sthulinger and Konrad Dannenburg the C-1 designation was
>>dropped when the CSM was put on the stack...
>
>The C designation was dropped in Feb 1963 when terminology was tidied up.
>Before then, it was a C-1 whether or not it had Apollo hardware on top.
>--
>"God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
> -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
>
Thanks for all that info, my copy of 'Stages to Saturn' is in a box
stored away somewhere. But wasn't this discussion REALLY about
whether Centaur actually flew on a Saturn? Not was it intended to,
but did it ever go up on one? It didn't, to the best of my knowledge.
-Brian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian S. Thorn "If ignorance is bliss,
BrianT@cup.portal.com this must be heaven."
-Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<72444@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianTReferences:
<h0l2prg@rpi.edu> <ewright.724543661@convex.convex.com> <phfrom.413@nyx.uni-konstanz.de> <1h2egpINNmk9@mirror.digex.com> <1992Dec23.192920.7268@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <23DEC199220530775@judy.uh.edu> <Bzu23x.4wq@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: ASTM, Saturn and MOL (Was Re: MOL) Message-ID: <72444@cup.portal.com> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 15:12:10 PST Organization: The Portal System (TM) References: <h0l2prg@rpi.edu> <ewright.724543661@convex.convex.com> <phfrom.413@nyx.uni-konstanz.de> <1h2egpINNmk9@mirror.digex.com> <1992Dec23.192920.7268@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <23DEC199220530775@judy.uh.edu> <Bzu23x.4wq@zoo.toronto.edu> Lines: 49