🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6456

Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)

#6456
From: Pat
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 17:10
21 lines
1335 bytes
In article <zgm2yh@rpi.edu> strider@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Greg Moore) writes:
>In article <71783@cup.portal.com> BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) writes:
>> has the RMS. No RMS scheduled? Add it to a mission and then add SVS.
>	This would work except for one major requirement of the SVS, a
>clear payload so that visibility and movement wasn't hindered.


Here seems a stupid one?

SVS needed a clear payload bay in order to test full arm extension.???

Now when a satellitte is carried up, it is inside some shrouds and often
a turntable spinner.  Also bigger payloads are on racks.

Why not towards the last day of flight,  EVA two astronauts and jettision
the miscellaneous hardware.?  sure it's sapce junk,  but they could
wrap it all together on some cables and deploy a large mylar drdrogue
shield so it's radar visible and has high atmospheric drag.  it should come
down in a few years, if the drag is sufficient.

any guesses?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!prb
References: <84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!prb
From: prb@access.digex.com (Pat)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)
Date: 19 Dec 1992 17:10:11 GMT
Organization: UDSI
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com>
References: <84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com