Article View: sci.space
Article #6481Re: I thinI see our problem. (Was Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX?
From: Gary Coffman
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 16:24
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 16:24
33 lines
2074 bytes
2074 bytes
In article <ewright.725129915@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes: >In <!jt240c@rpi.edu> strider@clotho.acm.rpi.edu (Greg Moore) writes: > >> In reality it sounds more like you are talking about DC-10, >>DC-12, etc. >> Unless you are saying that a 747 is the same plane as a DC-3 >>was. >> If your claims are about 50 years from now, or even 20 >>eyars from now, I'll buy them. > >I think it would do you a world of good to go out to your local >airport and look around. > >Do you have any idea how many DC-3s are still flying? After 50 >years? Better ask how many Wright Flyers are still in operation. That's a closer approximation of where we are in spaceflight relative to aeronautics. And don't forget to check on how many DC-1s and DC-2s are still doing scheduled flights. To compare aviation and spaceflight, go back in aviation history to where the total number of hours of powered flight of all aircraft equal the total number of hours of powered flight for all launchers. We're still at the sticks and string level. Actually, I'd claim we're back with the Montgolfier brothers. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec27.162459.20371@ke4zv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!garyReferences:
<1gt36dINNq3h@mirror.digex.com> <1992Dec20.195520.3587@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.725060424@convex.convex.com> <!jt240c@rpi.edu> <ewright.725129915@convex.convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: I thinI see our problem. (Was Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? Message-ID: <1992Dec27.162459.20371@ke4zv.uucp> Date: 27 Dec 92 16:24:59 GMT Article-I.D.: ke4zv.1992Dec27.162459.20371 References: <1gt36dINNq3h@mirror.digex.com> <1992Dec20.195520.3587@ke4zv.uucp> <ewright.725060424@convex.convex.com> <!jt240c@rpi.edu> <ewright.725129915@convex.convex.com> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) Organization: Destructive Testing Systems Lines: 33