Article View: sci.space
Article #6496Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:32
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:32
29 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
>Here seems a stupid one? > >SVS needed a clear payload bay in order to test full arm extension.??? > >Now when a satellitte is carried up, it is inside some shrouds and often >a turntable spinner. Also bigger payloads are on racks. > >Why not towards the last day of flight, EVA two astronauts and jettision >the miscellaneous hardware.? sure it's sapce junk, but they could >wrap it all together on some cables and deploy a large mylar drdrogue >shield so it's radar visible and has high atmospheric drag. it should come >down in a few years, if the drag is sufficient. > >any guesses? No, that's not a very good idea. We don't need more Space Junk floating around up there no matter how easy it is to see. On the other hand, when a TDRS/IUS is sent on it's way, it opens up a great big space in the payload bay. Plenty of room for the RMS Space Vision System's needs. So, if it needs a clear payload bay for tests, fly it on STS-54 (TDRS-F/IUS) or STS-51 (ACTS/TOS). I don't understand how this idea escaped the person who replied to my original post. -Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<72106@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianTReferences:
<84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu> <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...) Message-ID: <72106@cup.portal.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 18:32:05 PST Organization: The Portal System (TM) References: <84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu> <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com> Lines: 29