🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6498

Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)

#6498
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:35
29 lines
1538 bytes
>Here seems a stupid one?
>
>SVS needed a clear payload bay in order to test full arm extension.???
>
>Now when a satellitte is carried up, it is inside some shrouds and often
>a turntable spinner.  Also bigger payloads are on racks.
>
>Why not towards the last day of flight,  EVA two astronauts and jettision
>the miscellaneous hardware.?  sure it's sapce junk,  but they could
>wrap it all together on some cables and deploy a large mylar drdrogue
>shield so it's radar visible and has high atmospheric drag.  it should come
>down in a few years, if the drag is sufficient.
>
>any guesses?


  No, that's not a very good idea. We don't need more Space Junk floating
  around up there no matter how easy it is to see.
   
  On the other hand, when a TDRS/IUS is sent on it's way, it opens up
  a great big space in the payload bay. Plenty of room for the RMS
  Space Vision System's needs. So, if it needs a clear payload bay for
  tests, fly it on STS-54 (TDRS-F/IUS) or STS-51 (ACTS/TOS). I don't
  understand how this idea escaped the person who replied to my original
  post.
  
  -Brian
  
Technical Details
Message-ID: <72108@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
References: <84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu> <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Terminal Velocity of DCX? (was Re: Shuttle ...)
Message-ID: <72108@cup.portal.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 18:35:51 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
References: <84k24ya@rpi.edu> <71783@cup.portal.com> <zgm2yh@rpi.edu>
  <1gvl1jINN84@mirror.digex.com>
Lines: 29