Article View: sci.space
Article #6534Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements
From: Donald Lindsay
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 22:35
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 22:35
13 lines
1146 bytes
1146 bytes
aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes: >Can you name a product ever made by a successful company which DIDN'T >keep track of product development costs (as opposed to pure research) >and assign those costs to the product? Outside government, you won't. Hmmm. I remember hearing that Xerox bought SDS for a billion dollars - this would be about 1970. I heard later that Xerox had paid about twice what it was worth. Apparently SDS had been taking R&D costs and writing them into the books as assets, ie as if it had purchased capital equipment with the money. -- Don D.C.Lindsay Carnegie Mellon Computer Science
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzzqrC.3BK.2@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!lindsayReferences:
<BzzAGI.5v4.1@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Dec28.180732.2643@iti.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!lindsay From: lindsay+@cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements Message-ID: <BzzqrC.3BK.2@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 28 Dec 92 22:35:35 GMT Article-I.D.: cs.BzzqrC.3BK.2 References: <BzzAGI.5v4.1@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Dec28.180732.2643@iti.org> Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System) Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Lines: 13 Nntp-Posting-Host: gandalf.cs.cmu.edu