🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6560

Re: Comparative $/lb to LEO (Was: Stupid Shuttle Cost Arguments)

#6560
From: Edward V. Wright
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 17:11
19 lines
1672 bytes
In <n1351t@ofa123.fidonet.org> Wales.Larrison@ofa123.fidonet.org writes:

>    In comparison, Shuttle costs (depending on your source) about
>$350-500 M per launch. (As a check on this cost/flight range, the FY
>1992 NASA budget numbers for shuttle operating costs came to about $
>3.2 B, and there were a total of 8 flights flown in 1992, which
>gives about $ 400 M/flt, which is within the cost band I'm using).

Of course, in addition to "Shuttle operating costs," there are
ongoing Shuttle product-improvement/development costs.  Eight
flights per year is more than NASA's been able to manage most
years.  And you've conveniently ignored depreciation on the
orbiter and the $32 billion in Shuttle development costs (not
to mention interest on same).

That said, there are some launchers that cost more, per pound
of payload on orbit, than the Shuttle.  But they are very small
launchers that don't have many pounds of payload to spread
their cost across.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ewright.725649100@convex.convex.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!convex!convex!ewright
References: <n1351t@ofa123.fidonet.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!convex!convex!ewright
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Comparative $/lb to LEO (Was: Stupid Shuttle Cost Arguments)
Message-ID: <ewright.725649100@convex.convex.com>
Date: 29 Dec 92 17:11:40 GMT
References: <n1351t@ofa123.fidonet.org>
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: bach.convex.com
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.