🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6570

Re: Comparative $/lb to LEO (Was: Stupid Shuttle Cost Arguments)

#6570
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 19:57
16 lines
1491 bytes
In article <neff.12.725643434@iaiowa.physics.uiowa.edu> neff@iaiowa.physics.uiowa.edu (John S. Neff) writes:
>It is common for the shuttle to fly without a full cargo. In your calculation
>you assumed that the payload was the maximum for the orbit. You figures are
>the lower limit to the cost per pound for the shuttle. 

This is true for all launchers, actually.  It's not that rare for them to
fly with less-than-maximum payload due to other constraints, e.g. payload
volume, limits of deployment mechanisms, or a payload that simply doesn't
want hitchhikers for whatever reason.  It's somewhat more common for the
shuttle only because most shuttle missions are to low orbit and a large
fraction of non-shuttle missions are to Clarke orbit (where propulsion
systems for stationkeeping are invariably needed, so it's possible to
adjust fuel load to fully exploit the launcher).
-- 
"God willing... we shall return."       | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
       -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 |  henry@zoo.toronto.edu  utzoo!henry
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C01E43.JIJ@zoo.toronto.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
References: <n1351t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <neff.12.725643434@iaiowa.physics.uiowa.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: Comparative $/lb to LEO (Was: Stupid Shuttle Cost Arguments)
Message-ID: <C01E43.JIJ@zoo.toronto.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 19:57:36 GMT
References: <n1351t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <neff.12.725643434@iaiowa.physics.uiowa.edu>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 16