🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #6590

Re: Saturn lift capabilities

#6590
From: Brian Stuart Thorn
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 05:11
24 lines
1498 bytes
>A question: was a fully fueled CSM, flown in the ASTP launch inclination,
>capable of reboosting Skylab?  Was it structurally feasible?  If so, when
>was the decision made not to reboost after the AST-part of the mission was
>over?
>---
>Gerald Cecil

  Structurally feasible, yes, at least on the SkyLab side of the dock.
  The TRS was supposed to reboost Skylab using this port.
  
  The decision not to send an Apollo to reboost SkyLab was made almost
  entirely on the premise that Shuttle would be flying long before
  Skylab deorbited. But Shuttle was late and atmospheric expansion in
  that Solar Maximum was greater than expected. End result: chunks of
  Skylab in the Australian outback.
  
  -Brian
  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian S. Thorn                                    "If ignorance is bliss,
BrianT@cup.portal.com                               this must be heaven."
                                                -Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <72595@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
References: <Bzuvrp.9z9@zoo.toronto.edu> <1992Dec29.175754.24170@samba.oit.unc.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!BrianT
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Saturn lift capabilities
Message-ID: <72595@cup.portal.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 21:11:00 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: na
References: <Bzuvrp.9z9@zoo.toronto.edu>
  <1992Dec29.175754.24170@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Lines: 24