Article View: sci.space
Article #6595Re: Aluminum as rocket fuel?
From: John Roberts
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 05:16
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 05:16
52 lines
3025 bytes
3025 bytes
-From: jtk@s1.gov (Jordin Kare) -Subject: Re: Aluminum as rocket fuel? -Date: 29 Dec 92 22:18:33 GMT -Organization: LLNL -It is my understanding that there are serious technical difficulties in -making a workable aluminum/oxygen rocket. While I'm by no means an -expert, I believe the problems include: -Injection: How do you transport Al? How do you get it to mix with the O2? Maybe they'll have to get some technical assistance from the John Deere company (maker of agricultural combines). :-) [Combines use a mechanical feed to transport the harvested grain.] For final injection, it occurs to me that using gaseous oxygen to "blow" the powdered aluminum in might be an option. The final mix probably needs to be oxygen-rich if you want to maximize specific impulse. -Cooling: The combustion temperature of Al and O2 is very high (or they -wouldn't give even ~300 s Isp). Conventional engines are regeneratively cooled -by the fuel. Regenerative cooling with O2 is difficult -- O2 tends to -oxidize engine parts :-(. I suspect they'll eventually have to go for something like ceramic linings. -Exhaust flow properties: AlO2 is both refractory and abrasive. -I don't know (and I wouldn't be surprised if no one knew) just what the -condensation properties of AlO2 would be in a rocket exhaust, but it -seems likely that the exhaust will chew up most throat and nozzle materials -and may not provide very efficient thrust. According to Henry, there may also be problems with Al2O3 building up deposits on the inside of the engine. Aluminum-oxygen engines will probably be single-use for the forseeable future. -None of this makes an Al-O rocket impossible, just difficult -- enough so -that there are probably easier ways of getting mass off the moon. A linear launcher (or laser launcher - plug, plug :-) might be better in the long run. Aluminum engines might have an advantage in the short-to-medium run by virtue of lower startup costs. The first lunar launch systems will probably use fuel imported from off-moon. Combinations of the above might be useful. Other factors - possible eventual availability of volatiles from the asteroids, and dual-use laser systems for both launching and landing payloads on the moon. John Roberts roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0240n.Ly6.1@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.govShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov From: roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Aluminum as rocket fuel? Message-ID: <C0240n.Ly6.1@cs.cmu.edu> Date: 30 Dec 92 05:16:33 GMT Article-I.D.: cs.C0240n.Ly6.1 Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu Distribution: sci Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology formerly National Bureau of Standards Lines: 52 Approved: bboard-news_gateway X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU