Article View: sci.space
Article #6599Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity
From: John McCarthy
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:27
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:27
17 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
The reason Shuttle costs are so much more than projected is that the Shuttle requires this army to maintain it between flights. Hydrogen isn't much more expensive than expected, and I doubt the solid fuel is either. When the Shuttle was first proposed, the idea of operating it like an airline was part of the plan from the beginning. It turned out that the Shuttle operated too close to the limits of the materials and structures of which it was made. That's why it needs so much maintenance. If someone proposes a new reusable vehicle for going to earth orbit, it is reasonable to ask why its maintenance costs can be expected to be a lot less than those of the Shuttle. Any answer you get needs to be evaluated skeptically. -- John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305 * He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<JMC.92Dec29222737@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!CSD-NewsHost!jmcReferences:
<n1348t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <72527@cup.portal.com> <1992Dec29.191524.2413@iti.org> <72597@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!CSD-NewsHost!jmc From: jmc@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (John McCarthy) Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity In-Reply-To: BrianT@cup.portal.com's message of Tue, 29 Dec 92 21:12:54 PST Message-ID: <JMC.92Dec29222737@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University References: <n1348t@ofa123.fidonet.org> <72527@cup.portal.com> <1992Dec29.191524.2413@iti.org> <72597@cup.portal.com> Date: 29 Dec 92 22:27:37 Lines: 18