Article View: sci.space
Article #6602Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity
From: Allen W. Sherzer
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:43
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:43
17 lines
1153 bytes
1153 bytes
In article <JMC.92Dec29222737@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU writes: >If someone proposes a new reusable vehicle for going to earth orbit, >it is reasonable to ask why its maintenance costs can be expected to >be a lot less than those of the Shuttle. Any answer you get needs to >be evaluated skeptically. DC-X is being built so that the answer can be evaluated experimentally. Allen -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves | | aws@iti.org | nothing undone" | +----------------------115 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec30.134300.13259@iti.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!awsReferences:
<1992Dec29.191524.2413@iti.org> <72597@cup.portal.com> <JMC.92Dec29222737@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) Subject: Re: Stupid Shut Cost arguements (was Re: Terminal Velocity Message-ID: <1992Dec30.134300.13259@iti.org> Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow References: <1992Dec29.191524.2413@iti.org> <72597@cup.portal.com> <JMC.92Dec29222737@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:43:00 GMT Lines: 17