Re: Government-run programs Was: Re: Justification for the Space Program

Article View: sci.space

Article #6618

#6618

From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:07

19 lines
1126 bytes

In article <1992Dec29.145537.9264@cs.rochester.edu> Paul Dietz,
dietz@cs.rochester.edu writes:
>prevented from some action.  The government doesn't subsidize mountain
>climbing; why should it subsidize much more expensive space escapism?

The fact that you can equate these two things just shows how
out of touch with reality you really are.

Norman

Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
                               Hunter Thompson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec30.200706.29744@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!eos!aio!news

References: <1992Dec29.145537.9264@cs.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space,talk.politics.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!eos!aio!news
From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Government-run programs  Was: Re: Justification for the Space Program
Message-ID: <1992Dec30.200706.29744@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
X-Xxdate: Wed, 30 Dec 92 14:03:25 GMT
Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System)
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
References: <1992Dec29.145537.9264@cs.rochester.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:07:06 GMT
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message