Re: Justification for the Space Program

Article View: sci.space

Article #6624

#6624

From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:21

20 lines
1038 bytes

In article <1992Dec30.160648.14156@mr.med.ge.com> Mark Benson,
benson@gemed writes:
>    We now return to the discussion of the Nirvana of SSTO vs. the hell
of STS.
>    (I like 'em both - but zealots can't admit anyone elses viewpoint has
>    value.)

I can and I am a zealot.

Norman

Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company




When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
                               Hunter Thompson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec30.202156.233@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!news

References: <1992Dec30.160648.14156@mr.med.ge.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space,talk.politics.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!news
From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Justification for the Space Program
Message-ID: <1992Dec30.202156.233@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
X-Xxdate: Wed, 30 Dec 92 14:18:14 GMT
Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System)
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
References: <1992Dec30.160648.14156@mr.med.ge.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:21:56 GMT
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message