Article View: sci.space
Article #6633Re: Government-run programs Was: Re: Justification for the Space Program
From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:29
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:29
27 lines
1685 bytes
1685 bytes
In article <1992Dec30.203937.27599@iti.org> Allen W. Sherzer, aws@iti.org
writes:
>Now you might argue that space is the future of mankind and that a
>spacefaring civilization is more important than rock climbing. I aggree
>with that but must point out that if you think current government space
>activity has anything to do with that then YOU are the one out of touch.
Actually, that is exactly what I am arguing. Unlike you though, I see
the benefits derived from NASA's activities. Are there problems? yes.
Should NASA be doing commercial launches? Absolutely not. However,
to contend that NASA is a failure is to ignore that all pioneering
work started with a few individuals and a dream willing to make the
sacrifices to make their dream a reality. That step has been taken. NASA
should turn the commercial activities over to corporations and return to
doing cutting-edge scientific research, period.
Norman
Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
Hunter Thompson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec30.212906.2444@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!newsReferences:
<1992Dec30.200706.29744@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space,talk.politics.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!aio!news From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> Subject: Re: Government-run programs Was: Re: Justification for the Space Program Message-ID: <1992Dec30.212906.2444@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> X-Xxdate: Wed, 30 Dec 92 15:25:25 GMT Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System) Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12 References: <1992Dec30.200706.29744@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:29:06 GMT Lines: 27