Article View: sci.space
Article #6651Re: Saturn lift capabilities
From: Dave Michelson
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 01:02
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 01:02
17 lines
1220 bytes
1220 bytes
A lot of people obviously feel that Skylab was worth saving. Was it? Although items such as food and clothing could have been replenished rather easily, I'm under the impression that oxygen and nitrogen could not. Skylab was essentially designed as a "throw-away" workshop not a real space station. I assume that there was a comfortable safety margin built into Skylab, but how much life support capability was left after the last crew departed? I suppose that one could have docked an "environmental module" with replenishable O2 and N2 tanks at the docking port and, with suitable ventilation, kept the workshop habitable. Were plans for such a "life extension" module ever considered? -- Dave Michelson davem@ee.ubc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.010256.4062@ee.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fs1.ee.ubc.ca!davemReferences:
<72595@cup.portal.com> <1hsighINNich@mirror.digex.com> <C03BKr.Dt3@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fs1.ee.ubc.ca!davem From: davem@ee.ubc.ca (Dave Michelson) Subject: Re: Saturn lift capabilities Message-ID: <1992Dec31.010256.4062@ee.ubc.ca> Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering References: <72595@cup.portal.com> <1hsighINNich@mirror.digex.com> <C03BKr.Dt3@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 01:02:56 GMT Lines: 18