Article View: sci.space
Article #6692Re: SSTO vs 2 stage
From: Allen W. Sherzer
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:28
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:28
19 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
In article <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>Now, please point out to me where my analogy is flawed.
I do't think it is flawed so much as missing the point. The point is to
reduce the cost of access to LEO. Bruce's ideas to me seem well thought out
and practical. It cuts costs and reduces risk which is all that matters.
I agree with you that SSTO will eventually be the solution (at least the
way it looks now). That doesn't preclude other options which cut costs and
reduce risk as stepping stones leading in that direction.
Allen
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves |
| aws@iti.org | nothing undone" |
+----------------------114 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec31.182843.7749@iti.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!awsReferences:
<ewright.725755862@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec31.015157.14864@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) Subject: Re: SSTO vs 2 stage Message-ID: <1992Dec31.182843.7749@iti.org> Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow References: <ewright.725755862@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec31.015157.14864@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com> Distribution: sci Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:28:43 GMT Lines: 19