Article View: sci.space
Article #6698Re: Sea floor Planetary Protection really.
From: Pat
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 19:05
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 19:05
21 lines
1462 bytes
1462 bytes
In article <C03tGM.DpE.1@cs.cmu.edu> roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) writes: > > >By the way, before I forget - I recently saw an old (1960s) clip on NASA >Select, discussing the sterilization of unmanned probes for exploration of >planetary surfaces (so as to avoid contaminating possible native life before >studies could be conducted). The plan at that time was to sterilize the >probes by exposing them to ethylene oxide gas. Items such as sensors that >might be sensitive to ethylene oxide could be sterilized by other means, >and covered during exposure to the gas. NASA has adopted the COSPAR guidelines on planetary protection and i believe even has an office for this. They are concerned about contamination in both ways. They reccomend, heat sterilization, radiation, gas and chemicals. The big concern now is not so much establishing earth organisms on foreign bodies, but destroyin/contaminating archaeology studies of exo-biology. I know the Mars Observer orbit was constrained under planetary protection guidelines to stay off the surface for X thousand years.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1hvg8sINNppt@mirror.digex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!prbReferences:
<C03tGM.DpE.1@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!prb From: prb@access.digex.com (Pat) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Sea floor Planetary Protection really. Date: 31 Dec 1992 19:05:00 GMT Organization: UDSI Lines: 21 Distribution: sci Message-ID: <1hvg8sINNppt@mirror.digex.com> References: <C03tGM.DpE.1@cs.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com