Article View: sci.space
Article #6704Re: Public support for the space program
From: Brian Yamauchi
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:05
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:05
60 lines
3424 bytes
3424 bytes
In article <1992Dec30.230013.4102@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> writes: >>> The *relative* support of the space program is not very high. > >> Another Dietz assertion-without-proof... Please >> provide data which shows the relative support. > >Okay! The general consensus seems to be that public support for space exploration is wide but not deep. The majority of the people _do_ support government spending on space exploration, but only a small minority place it among their top priorities. The polling data presented does support Paul's claim that the relative importance that most people place on space exploration is low compared to the importance they place on more earthbound programs. On the other hand... > In response to the question > > "I am going to ask you a question about government spending. > In answering, please bear in mind that sooner or later all > government spending has to be taken out of the taxes that you > and other Americans pay. Thinking about the US space program, > tell me whether the amount of money now being spent for that purpose > should be increased, kept at the present level, reduced, or ended > altogether?" > > Year Increase Same Reduce End No Opinion > 1984 21% 48 23 5 3 > 1986 26 50 14 5 5 > 1989 27 42 22 4 5 > 1990 17 37 32 10 4 Even this data shows that a majority of the people (54%) support spending at least as much as we currently do on space exploration. In addition, another Gallup poll (quoted in Ad Astra about a year ago), indicated that the public drastically overestimates the amount of money being spent on space exploration. Average estimates were in the 5-10% range, when the actual figure is closer to 1%. Personally, I believe that current spending levels ($14 billion/year) could fund a vigorous, ambitious, manned and unmanned program of orbital, lunar, and interplanetary exploration and development -- if it were being spent properly... 5% of the federal budget ($60 billion/year) -- which most people seem to feel is a reasonable proportion, if these polls are correct -- could fund a fantastic space program -- but again, only if it were spent in the right ways and on the right things... Followups are directed to talk.politics.space. -- _______________________________________________________________________________ Brian Yamauchi Case Western Reserve University yamauchi@alpha.ces.cwru.edu Department of Computer Engineering and Science _______________________________________________________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<YAMAUCHI.92Dec31150539@yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!yamauchiReferences:
<1992Dec30.212906.2444@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <1992Dec30.230013.4102@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <1992Dec31.015903.15161@cs.rochester.edu> <1992Dec31.184656.14629@cs.rochester.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!yamauchi From: yamauchi@ces.cwru.edu (Brian Yamauchi) Newsgroups: sci.space,talk.politics.space Subject: Re: Public support for the space program Followup-To: talk.politics.space Date: 31 Dec 92 15:05:39 Organization: Case Western Reserve University Lines: 61 Distribution: world Message-ID: <YAMAUCHI.92Dec31150539@yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu> References: <1992Dec30.212906.2444@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <1992Dec30.230013.4102@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <1992Dec31.015903.15161@cs.rochester.edu> <1992Dec31.184656.14629@cs.rochester.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu In-reply-to: dietz@cs.rochester.edu's message of 31 Dec 92 18:46:56 GMT