🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec31.184656.14629@cs.rochester.edu> Paul Dietz,
dietz@cs.rochester.edu writes:
>	Year		Increase       Same   Reduce   End    No Opinion
>	1984		   21%		48	23	5	3
>	1986		   26		50	14	5	5
>	1989		   27		42	22	4	5
>	1990		   17		37	32     10	4

Thank you Paul, I truly appreciate it.

However, this just proves what I have believed for a long
time. First, in response to questions like this people are going to list
those items which effect their lives immediately first. Second, the
average citizen has no understanding of the benefits derived from
science R&D including space exploration and no real
vision of the future (NASA has failed at public relations). Finally,
note that they support manned over unmanned and they are for
keeping funding the same (not ending it as you have suggested).
I am bothered by the fact that nobody asked the question if funding
should increase at the inflation rate.

Norman

Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company




When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
                               Hunter Thompson