Article View: sci.space
Article #6766Re: SSTO vs 2 stage
From: Graydon
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 03:02
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 03:02
15 lines
1255 bytes
1255 bytes
Ed, having opinions about as tractable as an iridium lump does not help convince people, you know. What I understood Bruce to be proposing/discussing was the idea of building a bottom stage for a DC-1 for those occaisons when a 'heavy' payload needed launch. (Heavy - either something that grosses out long before it bulks out the cargo bay, or something that is going higher than LEO on one launch (for whatever reason)). This would seem to make a lot of sense; I did *not* understand him to be advocating *all* launches as being two stage, just those that would benefit from it. (Or are you arguing that there will never be any payloads that weigh too much for a DC-1?) Graydon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<93002.220235SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!qucdn!saundrsgReferences:
<ewright.725734633@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec30.180058.28938@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725755862@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec31.015157.14864@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!qucdn!saundrsg Organization: Queen's University at Kingston Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 22:02:35 EST From: Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Message-ID: <93002.220235SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: SSTO vs 2 stage Distribution: sci References: <ewright.725734633@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec30.180058.28938@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725755862@convex.convex.com> <1992Dec31.015157.14864@cs.rochester.edu> <ewright.725820847@convex.convex.com> Lines: 15