Article View: sci.space
Article #6948Re: Let's be more specific (was: Stupid Shut Cost arguements)
From: Gary Coffman
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:14
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:14
22 lines
1601 bytes
1601 bytes
In article <1993Jan2.043524.15196@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes: >In article <1993Jan1.030602.21051@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes: > >>Is this relevant? Yes if we want to compare >>*vehicles*, no if we want to compare *programs*. It's important to realize >>that DC is projected to operate under a completely different set of rules >>than Shuttle is forced to use. > >Which is indeed half the battle. But since you back Shuttle no matter what >it costs, I don't see your point. I back Shuttle because it's flying *now* and nothing else flying *now* has it's capabilities at *any* price. When that changes, I'll be happy to see it retired, but not one second before that. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.191452.12294@ke4zv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!garyReferences:
<1992Dec28.172953.26161@ke4zv.uucp> <1992Dec28.202920.5932@iti.org> <1993Jan1.030602.21051@ke4zv.uucp> <1993Jan2.043524.15196@iti.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: Let's be more specific (was: Stupid Shut Cost arguements) Message-ID: <1993Jan4.191452.12294@ke4zv.uucp> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) Organization: Destructive Testing Systems References: <1992Dec28.172953.26161@ke4zv.uucp> <1992Dec28.202920.5932@iti.org> <1993Jan1.030602.21051@ke4zv.uucp> <1993Jan2.043524.15196@iti.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 19:14:52 GMT Lines: 22