Article View: sci.space
Article #7036Re: Soviet space disaster?
From: Chris Jones
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:06
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:06
40 lines
2575 bytes
2575 bytes
In article <4121@iris.mincom.oz.au>, marks@iris (Mark Stavar) writes: >I recall reading that at some point earlyish in the Russian space >programme that there was a retro mis-fire on one of their missions. >This lead to the unfortunate situation of the space craft in question >flying off directly into the sun. The story mentioned something about >the wife of the cosmonaut in question being in radio contact with him >up to the very end. Wow. Given the delta-V requirement to cause a spacecraft in earth orbit to go "flying off directly into the sun", this report has to be mistaken. The first Soviet orbital test of the Vostok spacecraft (variously called Sputnik 4 or Korabl Sputnik 1) was intended to demonstrate the spacecraft's performance in orbit as well as test its retrofire system. According to the launch announcement, it did not have a heat shield, and so would be destroyed by its encounter with the atmosphere after retrofire. In the actual event, KS1 was aligned almost exactly 180 degrees out of position for retrofire, so the retrofire had the effect of boosting it into a higher orbit, from which it eventually decayed months later. I have read reports that Komarov on Soyuz 1 had a farewell message for his wife before his ultimately fatal reentry, but I have no way of knowing whether or not this is true. It's the kind of thing that tends to get reported even if it isn't true. The tale you report sounds like it could have its basis in those two incidents. >I have no hard material evidence with which to back up this story - it >may be plain wrong. That would be my guess. (I have received email from Ken Schmahl which says that near the end of _Spycatcher_ there is a report of a Soviet cosmonaut being stranded in orbit and transmitting for hours before dying. My first impression is that this sounds a lot like the other unreputable reports I have read, but since I think this source is supposed to be more reliable than average, I'm going to give it a look). -- Chris Jones clj@ksr.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<20639@ksr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!world!ksr!clj@ksr.comReferences:
<2JAN199307174468@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov> <4121@iris.mincom.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!world!ksr!clj@ksr.com From: clj@ksr.com (Chris Jones) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Soviet space disaster? Message-ID: <20639@ksr.com> Date: 5 Jan 93 13:06:22 GMT References: <2JAN199307174468@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov> <4121@iris.mincom.oz.au> Sender: news@ksr.com Reply-To: clj@ksr.com (Chris Jones) Followup-To: soc.history Organization: Kendall Square Research Corp Lines: 40 In-reply-to: marks@iris.mincom.oz.au (Mark Stavar)