Article View: sci.space
Article #7059Re: SSF & Mir & Energia
From: Sean Michael Gallagher
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:00
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:00
12 lines
1117 bytes
1117 bytes
roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) writes: >Energia (it's only flown twice). The main problem with choosing these options >at this point is that if they are to be used, the decision should have been >made several years ago. Yes, but several years ago we were too busy worrying about whether the Soviets' more advanced booster technology would be used to lob a couple of hundred nuclear missles our way. The Russians are offering us help (for a fee), so why are we so unwilling to accept it? Goldin's NASA is supposed to work smarter, faster, and cheaper, and Energia is a heckuva lot faster and cheaper than Shuttle, and that seems like a smart idea to me.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41p37nn@rpi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!rpi!gallas2References:
<C1G5An.JJ5.1@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!rpi!gallas2 From: gallas2@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Sean Michael Gallagher) Subject: Re: SSF & Mir & Energia Message-ID: <41p37nn@rpi.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: marcus.its.rpi.edu References: <C1G5An.JJ5.1@cs.cmu.edu> Distribution: sci Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:00:42 GMT Lines: 12