🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #7067

Re: How many flights are Orbiters designed for?

#7067
From: Edward V. Wright
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:56
13 lines
1429 bytes
In <1993Jan4.181413.21254@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes:

>There will be no private financing of a SSTO proof of concept. The current
>and projected market is simply too small and not profitable enough to
>warrent private capital.

With friends like you, who needs Gary Coffman? :-)

The one way to make certain there is no private financing is 
to place all your eggs in the DoD basket and not look for any.
This is very dangerous unless you believe DoD funding is a 
sure thing.  (In which case it's still dangerous, because
you'd be wrong.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ewright.726252999@convex.convex.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!news.utdallas.edu!convex!ewright
References: <725984212snz@chrism.demon.co.uk> <1993Jan2.171539.9059@iti.org> <ewright.726167217@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan4.181413.21254@iti.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!news.utdallas.edu!convex!ewright
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: How many flights are Orbiters designed for?
Message-ID: <ewright.726252999@convex.convex.com>
Date: 5 Jan 93 16:56:39 GMT
References: <725984212snz@chrism.demon.co.uk> <1993Jan2.171539.9059@iti.org> <ewright.726167217@convex.convex.com> <1993Jan4.181413.21254@iti.org>
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Lines: 13
Nntp-Posting-Host: bach.convex.com
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.