Article View: sci.space
Article #7129Re: Clinton's Promises (space) in Charlotte Observer
From: Bruce F. Webster
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:10
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:10
45 lines
2974 bytes
2974 bytes
In article <21JAN199320444611@judy.uh.edu> wingo%cspara.decnet@Fedex.Msfc.Nasa.Gov writes: > In article <ewright.727553712@convex.convex.com>, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes... > >In <rabjab.31.727504007@golem.ucsd.edu> rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (rabjab) writes: > > > >>> B. Support completion of the space station Freedom. > > > >>Looks like Clinton is going to make some rather severe cuts in space > >>projects. And "supporting completion" doesn't mean actual completion. > > > >You don't understand. NASA doesn't *want* Space Station Freedom > >completed. > > > > No you don't understand and your statement is a prime reason people like > you are not listened to at NASA. Even looking at the proposition from a > pragmatical political perspective, this statment of yours is false. Why? > > If NASA drags their feet and does not finish the station costs soar and > nothing gets done. Space Station Freedom was originally proposed in what? 1982?, was supposed to be on orbit and operational in 1992, and was supposed to cost a total of $8B. It is now 1993, not a single actual piece of Fred has been built (much less placed on orbit), and the estimated total cost is $40B and rising. Q.E.D. I used to work for NASA (as an employee of Singer/Link, the former contractor on the Space Shuttle Flight Simulator at JSC) and also worked at the Lunar and Planetary Institute next door. I have friends who are still heavily involved in the space industry at various levels. I happen to think that the best thing Clinton could do would be to kill SS Fred and offer $10B, tax-free, to the first US corporation or consortium to put a station on orbit and keep it staffed by at least X people for a year and day. He should also offer $5B to the second corporation/consortium to do the same thing. The government would spend less, create more jobs, and built an 21st century industrial base. ..bruce.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce F. Webster | We hackers linger by our leading edge CTO, Pages Software Inc | Forgetting what is pending in the cache bwebster@pages.com | Till practice hurtles past us, and we crash. #import <pages/disclaimer.h> | -- Jeff Duntemann -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan27.021023.8557@pages.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!news.acns.nwu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!pages!bwebsterReferences:
<21JAN199320444611@judy.uh.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!news.acns.nwu.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!nosc!pages!bwebster From: bwebster@pages.com (Bruce F. Webster) Subject: Re: Clinton's Promises (space) in Charlotte Observer Message-ID: <1993Jan27.021023.8557@pages.com> Sender: bwebster@pages.com Reply-To: bwebster@pages.com Organization: Pages Software Inc. References: <21JAN199320444611@judy.uh.edu> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 02:10:23 GMT Lines: 47