Article View: sci.space
Article #7138Re: Fabrication (was fast track failures)
From: Gary Coffman
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 21:29
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 21:29
44 lines
2778 bytes
2778 bytes
In article <1993Jan4.202421.11388@cs.ucf.edu> clarke@acme.ucf.edu (Thomas Clarke) writes: >In article <1993Jan4.171213.11272@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) >writes: >> In article <ewright.725666125@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward >V. Wright) writes: >> > >> Most engineering *is* paperwork, or workstation work today. Otherwise >> it's just tinkering on a wing and a prayer. You have to bend metal to >> *test* your engineering, but bending metal *isn't* engineering. It's >> fabrication done by tradesmen. > >I can't let this go by. This is a common attitude in America. It >leads to low pay for production engineers and inefficient production >methods etc. etc. Result is the current economic morass with most >production going overseas. > >I think engineering must consider how something is to be made. The >most elegant design is useless if it can't be manufactured. >Knowledge of what can be made is obtained by bending metal, or >at least by interacting with those who do. I'm not disparaging skilled tradesmen, in fact I usually hold them in higher regard than most engineers. Engineers would benefit by *listening* to them more often. But hammering metal is a skilled trade, not engineering. Good engineers take production requirements into account in their designs, bad ones don't. Production engineers do time and motion, setup optimized assembly lines, and natter about workgroups and just in time subassembly deliveries. Those are important in some mass production facilities, but good design engineers make or break production at the very beginning of the development cycle. Ease of assembly and ease of field service have to be designed in from the very beginning of a product. Having design engineers apprentice on the shop floor for a few years *before* they get to design a product would do a world of good for our manufacturing sector. It certainly has for the Japanese and old school Germans. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | You make it, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary Destructive Testing Systems | we break it. | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary 534 Shannon Way | Guaranteed! | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | | emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan5.212935.21012@ke4zv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!gatech!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!garyReferences:
<1993Jan4.171213.11272@ke4zv.uucp> <1993Jan4.202421.11388@cs.ucf.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!gatech!emory!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) Subject: Re: Fabrication (was fast track failures) Message-ID: <1993Jan5.212935.21012@ke4zv.uucp> Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) Organization: Destructive Testing Systems References: <1993Jan4.171213.11272@ke4zv.uucp> <1993Jan4.202421.11388@cs.ucf.edu> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:29:35 GMT Lines: 44