🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #7200

Re: Justification for the Space Program

#7200
From: Jim O'Brien
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:57
56 lines
3228 bytes
Subject: Justification for the Space Program
From: RWTMS2::MUNIZB, MUNIZB%RWTMS2.decnet@beach.rockwell.com
Date: 23 Jan 93 02:59:07 GMT
In article <C1ADyE.9FJ.1@cs.cmu.edu> RWTMS2::MUNIZB,
MUNIZB%RWTMS2.decnet@beach.rockwell.com writes:
>I know that the discussion regarding the justification for the space 
>program died out about 2 weeks ago, but I just bought a book related to 
>the subject and I was wondering if anyone on the net has read it.
>
>It's called "Breakout Into Space, Mission for a Generation" by George 
>Henry Elias.  The cover blurb reads in part: "(the book) presents a 
>broadly, efficiently argued case for moving civilization beyond Earth's 
>limits and into the solar system. (Elias) explores the environmental, 
>economic,, and political benefits of space settlement.  Inhabiting space 
>is no longer science fiction, but human necessity - and destiny . . . 
>The establishment of a space civilization is an essential part of the 
>effort to preserve the environment, prevent global war, and provide a 
>stable economic future".
>
>Any comments about the book, either pro or con?
>
>Disclaimer: Opinions stated are solely my own (unless I change my mind).
>Ben Muniz     MUNIZB%RWTMS2.decnet@consrt.rockwell.com    w(818)586-3578
>Space Station Freedom:Rocketdyne/Rockwell:Structural Loads and Dynamics
>   "Man will not fly for fifty years": Wilbur to Orville Wright, 1901

Don't know anything about the book, but I'll stay stuck to this beautiful
green and blue planet for a while, thank you.  I think this is a totally
unrealistic and ridiculous justification for the space program.  Pursuit
of basic scientific knowledge should be our focus, at least for the
forseeable future.



###################################################

Jim O'Brien
jzo@inel.gov

Just SLIPpin' along...


<Sorry about the obnoxious disclaimer>
###################################################
========== long legal disclaimer follows, press n to skip ===========

Neither the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory or any of their employees, makes any warranty, whatsoever,
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility regarding any
information, disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe
privately owned rights.  No specific reference constitutes or implies
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States
Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.  The views and
opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the
United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory,
and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan28.015703.7275@inel.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!news.dell.com!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!news
References: <C1ADyE.9FJ.1@cs.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!news.dell.com!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!news
From: Jim O'Brien <jzo@inel.gov>
Subject: Re: Justification for the Space Program
Message-ID: <1993Jan28.015703.7275@inel.gov>
X-Xxdate: Wed, 27 Jan 93 18:57:10 GMT
Sender: news@inel.gov
Organization: inel
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
References: <C1ADyE.9FJ.1@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 01:57:03 GMT
Lines: 56