Article View: sci.space
Article #7209Re: *** BUSSARD RAMSCOOP ***
From: Jason Cooper
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 01:27
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 01:27
24 lines
1500 bytes
1500 bytes
Sorry, couldn't quote all of this one.
Firstly. I see what you are talking about _now_. Sounds not too bad.
However, it still seems to me that carbon-catalyzed may be a great way to
go. 1) your carbon keeps coming back and 2) you won't have to carry
around what I see as becoming GIGANTIC amounts of antimatter. So what
YOU are talking about is using antimatter as a partial source of the
energy to get the hydrogen to FUSE? Sounds good thus far...
Scramjet... You know, that may be a SUPERB idea! Though you can't use
it initially, I'm looking at seperating the magnetic coils into groups
that are individually controlled. Such things as a bussard scramjet
could be used at high velocities (near the theoretical limit of
non-scramjet engines), which would give us 4 stages...
Conventional drive (perhaps an injected nuclear pulse engine?)
Carbon (or antimatter) catalyzed fusion drive
Proton-Proton fusion drive
Scramjet p-p fusion drive
Sound good on that end? Any more help on the carbon-antimatter selection
would be MUCH MUCH MUCH appreciated!
Jason Cooper
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<wwLXwB4w165w@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!tradent!lordReferences:
<C0CKyt.7o0@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!tradent!lord From: lord@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca (Jason Cooper) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: *** BUSSARD RAMSCOOP *** Message-ID: <wwLXwB4w165w@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 93 17:27:43 PST References: <C0CKyt.7o0@zoo.toronto.edu> Organization: TradeNET International Trade Corp. Lines: 24