Article View: sci.space
Article #7248Re: SSTO vs 2 stage
From: Magnus Redin
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:28
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:28
18 lines
1450 bytes
1450 bytes
Bruce_Dunn@mindlink.bc.ca (Bruce Dunn) writes:
> The most likely thing that we are going to want in large quantities
>in orbit is propellant. For example, a Mars expedition using conventional
>chemical propulsion might require something like 5000 tons initial mass in
>orbit, most of which is LOX and LH2. To transfer 50 tons of LOX and LH2 to
>orbit in a DC-1 using a lower stage,
Wouldent it be a much smaller technical risk if one built 10 more DC-1
wehicels instead and stream lined the fuel flights?
It ought to be cheaper but I havent got reliable figurs.
I think it makes sence to use standard DC-1 wehicels for simple high volume
cargo until there is enough flights to justify a gas gun that launches
smal cannisters for a much lover cost per kilogram to orbit.
--
--
Magnus Redin Lysator Academic Computer Society redin@lysator.liu.se
Mail: Magnus redin, Rydsv{gen 240C26, 582 51 LINK|PING, SWEDEN
Phone: Sweden (0)13 260046 (Answering machine) and (0)120 13706
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0G3BB.1Iv@lysator.liu.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!my!omega!lysator.liu.se!redinReferences:
<19254@mindlink.bc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!my!omega!lysator.liu.se!redin From: redin@lysator.liu.se (Magnus Redin) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: SSTO vs 2 stage Message-ID: <C0G3BB.1Iv@lysator.liu.se> Date: 6 Jan 93 18:28:21 GMT References: <19254@mindlink.bc.ca> Sender: news@lysator.liu.se Organization: Lysator ACC at Linkoping University Lines: 18