Article View: sci.space
Article #7327Biosphere 2 Oxygen and other Questions
From: Taber
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 06:02
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 06:02
143 lines
7545 bytes
7545 bytes
Biosphere 2 Oxygen and other Questions January 27, 1993 Sixteen months down and eight to go. Sorry to be so long in posting answers to the many questions, I simply have not been able to make enough time in here. We don't know where all the oxygen has gone. This is one of the biggest mysteries so far. While the CO2 removal system can account for some of the O2 loss, as oxidation of organic material producing CO2, which was then removed from the air by the system. The amount of CO2 removed from the air only accounts for about one fifth of the total oxygen deficit. We have essentially two leading theories, first is oxidation of reduced compounds that may have been present at closure, like possibly a reduced iron. The second is oxidation of organic material in the soil and subsequent precipitation of the CO2 as a calcium carbonate, the parent materials for this are abundant but the necessary conditions are in question. We are also in the process of doing small chamber experiments with soil similar to that in Biosphere 2. Carbon and Oxygen isotopes are also being extensively studied for clews to what is going on. The soils are the main point of interest because it is the only place in the biosphere big enough to hide 12,000 Kg of O2. The CO2 is now at an average concentration of 3500 ppm, with a 400 to 500 ppm diurnal swing. The sunny weather we are having now is bringing the average CO2 concentration down at a rate of 80 ppm per diurnal cycle, without any use of the CO2 removal system which is now off. This means that the draw down during the day is 80 ppm greater than the rise at night. To put 3,500 ppm in perspective, a room with people in it and normal ventilation can easily get this high. Also CO2 concentrations between 5,000 and 8,000 ppm CO2 is not uncommon in the space shuttle and submarines. Human health difficulties seem to begin at about 9,000 to 11,000 ppm. Increased CO2 does result in faster growth rates with many plants. There was no bias against the Sabatier or Bosch systems, they were simply not considered necessary at the time. We had no idea that the oxygen phenomena would occur. What we did know was that during the winter we would have an excess of CO2 and in the summer quite possibly a deficit. We are able to put the CO2 back in the air during the summer and have it made into plant material, thus completing an annual cycle of CO2 storage and release. The summer release of CO2 should stimulate plant growth and replenish some of the oxygen. A basic problem with the Sabatier or Bosch systems and our situation is that we do not have enough CO2 in the air to significantly change the O2 using a system that would liberate the O2 form the CO2. Even in the summer with low CO2 in the air, the O2 loss is at about 0.26% O2 per month, while the average CO2 concentration is fairly constant at only 0.12%. Even converting all the CO2 in the air to C + O2 would have little effect on the O2 situation. Using such a system to drive the CO2 even lower would begin to reduce food crop production rates, because the plants would become limited by the availability of CO2. So there is no need to transform the CO2, just temporarily store it in the winter. Note that if we had constant high levels of light, like in space for instance, this CO2 storage scenario would be mute because we would have no need to try and survive a low light season! The CO2 removal system I designed uses sodium hydroxide as a scrubbing fluid, removing a fraction of all acid forming gasses in the air. This is done using a large reaction column with a high air flow rate, even so we can only remove 100 to 200 ppm per day with the system. On a low sunlight day the CO2 can jump up 300 to 400 ppm, so the system can only moderate trends. The sodium carbonates formed from the CO2 and sodium hydroxide are reacted with calcium hydroxide to form CaCO3 (limestone) which regenerates the scrubbing fluid back to sodium hydroxide. The CO2 is thus stored as CaCO3 until time to release the CO2, which is done by heating the CaCO3 making CaCO and CO2. The CaCO can then be re-hydrated with the water in the scrubbing fluid and all the chemicals are restored and ready for the next winter. This may not be the best system, but it works. It is too heavy for a space application but may possibly be made from local materials. Also a basic problem with any system is the need to process a large volume of air. If the CO2 was at 1000 ppm, then for every liter of CO2 removed, one needs to process 2000 liters of air with a 50% efficient system. This can be done either by pre-concentrating, which is difficult with a volume as big as Biosphere 2, or processing the whole air which is also hard. Ambient temperature scrubbing of air in a reaction column, using a hydroxide, can handle large volumes of air quite easily. A similar system is used in space craft with solid lithium hydroxide. Pressure swing systems are being considered for space station using materials that adsorb CO2 at cabin pressure and release the CO2 to space vacuum and/or with heating. The smell is usually great. I have a pure air generator that makes very clean air by pressure swing adsorption, air with no smell. By breathing this air for a period of about 30 minutes, it tends to "zero" my sense of smell so for a short time after, 4 to 10 minutes, I can smell the air in the Biosphere. It smells like rich farm soil (not potting mix), a sweet fresh smell. There are some exceptions to this, like when the sewage system has a problem such as inadvertent overflowing, but after cleanup the smell only persists for one to three of hours. Also if a container of some wet organic material is not tended, it can smell rather bad. Methane buildups have not occurred, this is probably due to methanotrophic bacteria increasing to consume the methane thereby keeping it in check. We have thus-far had no problem with any trace compounds building up in the atmosphere or water supply. We haven't even needed to use the soil bed reactor system to clean the air. The soil bed reactor is designed to force air through the soil in the agriculture biome as a means of cleaning the air. We are now at the two thirds mark, I am sorry to say that I can not be more specific than to say that group dynamics are quite exciting. Some studies I have seen say that in a situation with a confined crew, the third quarter is usually the most difficult time. Oxygen additions are continuing, we are now at about 17.5%. The low light conditions that we have had over the last two months may delay harvest times with some crops as much as a month. The effect of this on our total food production will not be fully seen until mid March, at which time we will be able to evaluate the situation decisively. Taber MacCallum Biosphere 2 Crew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1Jvxv.Hr4.1@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!Taber@bio2.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!Taber@bio2.com From: Taber@bio2.com Subject: Biosphere 2 Oxygen and other Questions Message-ID: <C1Jvxv.Hr4.1@cs.cmu.edu> X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu Organization: [via International Space University] Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU Distribution: sci Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 06:02:39 GMT Approved: bboard-news_gateway Lines: 143