Article View: sci.space
Article #7369Re: was: question about SETI, now: planets around pulsars?
From: robert.f.casey
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 02:05
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 02:05
16 lines
1437 bytes
1437 bytes
In article <C0HvLB.1op@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: >Actually very little, as these things go. The ongoing SETI efforts are >quite small. >Astronomers are very interested in the immediate vicinity of pulsars, >because it's an excellent bet that you can find objects of great theoretical >interest (accretion disks and such) there. Peculiar and conspicuous objects >thereabouts would not be missed. And yes, astronomers take the possibility >of finding an extraterrestrial beacon quite seriously -- the first pulsars >caused a considerable stir until it was clear that they were just natural >phenomena. About a year or so ago, some astronomers thought that they might have found planets orbiting a pulsar. One suspect pulsar planetary system turned out to be false (orbit of one "planet" was 1/2 the time of Earth's, and thus suspect), but another looked good then. Anyone know if this other (at the time) good detection has held up? Confirmed?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan8.020559.10713@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!wa2iseReferences:
<tim.726364246@giaeb> <C0HvLB.1op@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!wa2ise From: wa2ise@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (robert.f.casey) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: was: question about SETI, now: planets around pulsars? Message-ID: <1993Jan8.020559.10713@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Date: 8 Jan 93 02:05:59 GMT References: <tim.726364246@giaeb> <C0HvLB.1op@zoo.toronto.edu> Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T Lines: 16