Re: DC-1 and the $23M NASA Toilet

Article View: sci.space

Article #7378

#7378

From: Curtis Roelle
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 20:29

10 lines
861 bytes

schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher) writes:

>>Unnecessarily, if so, since the solutions developed for Skylab actually
>>worked pretty well.  (Notably, the Skylab toilet worked.)  For rather
>>longer than a week, too.

>Uhhh... why didn't NASA just reuse the Skylab toilet on Shuttle?

Perhaps because not much was left of it after reentry over Australia? <:-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <roelle.726438574@uars_mag>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!aplcen.apl.jhu.edu!uars_mag!roelle

References: <1ige15INN30a@cbl.umd.edu> <C0H1n3.9ML@zoo.toronto.edu> <schumach.726431013@convex.convex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!aplcen.apl.jhu.edu!uars_mag!roelle
From: roelle@uars_mag.jhuapl.edu (Curtis Roelle)
Subject: Re: DC-1 and the $23M NASA Toilet
Message-ID: <roelle.726438574@uars_mag>
Sender: news@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Johns Hopkins University
References: <1ige15INN30a@cbl.umd.edu> <C0H1n3.9ML@zoo.toronto.edu> <schumach.726431013@convex.convex.com>
Date:  7 Jan 93 20:29:34 GMT
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message