Article View: sci.space
Article #7532Re: fiber optic cable
From: Brad Whitehurst
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:33
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:33
47 lines
2793 bytes
2793 bytes
In article <C0ozH8.4p4.1@cs.cmu.edu> roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) writes: > >-From: Mark.Perew@p201.f208.n103.z1.fidonet.org >-Subject: Fiber optic umbilical >-Date: 4 Jan 93 15:30:14 GMT > >-Putting a fiber optic umbilical on a remote sensing platform designed to >-traverse rough terrain seems very odd to me. Can someone explain to me why >-this was done? A few things come to mind such as eliminating the weight >-required for a radio and associated power supply. Also the fiber optic does >-allow for high reliability and high speed data transfer. > >-I'm *not* throwing stones at the Dante folks. I'm just doing some head >-scratching and hoping someone will explain this to me. > >Well, one thing for sure - plans for an Earth-Mars fiber optic link >will have to be scrapped. :-) > >I can imagine the Dante team trying to straighten out the cable by hand, >and that tiny, heartbreaking "snap" (or maybe they didn't hear anything >at all). Commercial fiber optic cable is great in stationary applications, >but it's too easy to stretch it or bend it beyond the radius of curvature >limits. The people who install our fiber optic links put up warning signs >with a drawing of a hangman's noose, implying what will happen to anybody >who tries to move the equipment. :-) > >Does anybody (the phone companies or the military, for instance) use >fiber optic cable that's stiff enough to reduce the risk of breaking? > Speaking to a friend in Pittsburgh who is apparently acquainted with one of the students on the Dante team this weekend, she commented that they had apparently had an intermittent glitch in the fiber cable before they went to Antarctica (N.B., while likely, this is still 2nd hand quasi-rumor). The cable supplier apparently tested the assembly and claimed to find no problem. So, the flaw may have existed all along, and progressed to a complete break in field condition. Actually, fibers can be quite rugged. Isn't there a new version of one of the wire-guided anti-tank missiles that uses a fiber instead of copper, to reduce weight and increase range? Is it operational? The key is to make a cable that is not stiff, I would guess. -- Brad Whitehurst | Aerospace Research Lab rbw3q@Virginia.EDU | We like it hot...and fast.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.163311.11274@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!rayleigh.mech.Virginia.EDU!rbw3qReferences:
<C0ozH8.4p4.1@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!rayleigh.mech.Virginia.EDU!rbw3q From: rbw3q@rayleigh.mech.Virginia.EDU (Brad Whitehurst) Subject: Re: fiber optic cable Message-ID: <1993Jan11.163311.11274@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia References: <C0ozH8.4p4.1@cs.cmu.edu> Distribution: sci Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:33:11 GMT Lines: 47