Article View: sci.space
Article #7543Re: Railgun in Southwest US
From: kjenks
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:24
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:24
63 lines
3883 bytes
3883 bytes
In article <C0HtJ3.Lqo.1@cs.cmu.edu> ssi!lfa@uunet.UU.NET ("Louis F. Adornato") writes:
>Personally, I don't know that a railgun is going to be worth much for
>anything other than ASAT and ABM applications. The problem is that a
>ground launched body can't attain orbit (at least, not an orbit that
>doesn't intersect the surface) without a circularizing burn at
>periapsis. This means that you have to carry propulsion (motor and
>fuel), GNC hardware (star trackers or a gyro/accelerometer platform,
>momentum wheels or an RCS, guidance computer and control hardware),
>power and cooling, a shroud capable of protecting the whole shebang
>when it exits the launcher in sea level air at better than 17,000 mph
>(orbital velocity at 150 mi), aerosurfaces to prevent tumbling, and
>probably active control of same, and still retain enough mass
>capability for a payload.
You also has to survive the launch. With accellerations up to 5
million G, temperatures in the 1000's C range, and some of the most
serious electrical and magnetic fields you can find anywhere, you
wouldn't want to be fired out of a rail gun. Nor would you want to
try to design a payload which could be fired out of a rail gun.
But for those of you who don't know what a railgun is, I'll give you a
brief intro. This is a VERY high level description, greatly
simplified. A rail gun works because of the interaction between an
electrical field with a magnetic field called the Lorentz force. If I
recall correctly, the basic equation is f = E x B. So you want great
big E (electrical) fields and hefty B (magnetic) fields so you get a
whole lot of f = mA.
Let's see if I can explain using ASCII sketches:
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN <- North end of
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN magnetic field
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++P++++++++ <- Positive rail
<- Velocity vector <- P
-----------------------------------------P-------- <- Negative rail
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS <- South end of
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS magnetic field
Where "PPP" marks the payload or payload carrier, which is a conducting
bar touching both rails. A great big current flows through the rails,
passing through PPP. This electrical field is perpendicular to the
magnetic field, so the PPP is subject to the Lorentz force, f = E x B.
Assuming there's little or no friction with the rails (which is very
difficult to arrange), the PPP scoots down the rails in a heckuva
hurry, accellerating as it goes. Because there is friction with the
rails, they erode quickly and have to be replaced after every N
launches, where N varies with the friction and wear properties.
Since you need to reach orbital velocity in a short distance, you need
to have BIG accellerations. This implies the big E fields (hence hefty
current along the rails and PPP), big B fields (hence hefty magnets),
and low mass (f = mA).
We now return you to discussions about the PEACEFUL use of space.
-- Ken Jenks, NASA/JSC/GM2, Space Shuttle Program Office
kjenks@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov (713) 483-4368
"...Development of the space station is as inevitable as
the rising of the sun." -- Wernher von Braun
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.202452.16251@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!eos!aio!gothamcity!kjenksReferences:
<C0HtJ3.Lqo.1@cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!eos!aio!gothamcity!kjenks From: kjenks@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov Subject: Re: Railgun in Southwest US Message-ID: <1993Jan11.202452.16251@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> Originator: kjenks@gothamcity Keywords: accelleration Sender: kjenks@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov Organization: NASA/JSC/GM2, Space Shuttle Program Office References: <C0HtJ3.Lqo.1@cs.cmu.edu> Distribution: sci Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:24:52 GMT Lines: 63