🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space
Article #7742

X-29

#7742
From: Christopher A. Welty
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1986 06:30
16 lines
1222 bytes
	I appreciate the comments H Thomas Sharp has on the X-29, but
I have one question about something he said:

>   o While wing sweep, either fore or aft, postpones the drag rise near
>     Mach 1, a FSW has a lower wing profile drag than a ASW.  Therefore,
>     one can obtain higher lift coefficients under transonic conditions.
>     This translates into a greater payload capacity for a given aspect
>     ratio.

	I'm by no means an expert, but isn't profile drag simply the
sum of the skin friction and form drag of an object?  How could the
wing being forward or backward swept have anything to do with it, do
you mean the FSWs are generally of a different shape?  

			-Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8611130630.AA20133@cieunix.rpi.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!ucbvax!CSV.RPI.EDU!weltyc%cieunix

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!ucbvax!CSV.RPI.EDU!weltyc%cieunix
From: weltyc%cieunix@CSV.RPI.EDU (Christopher A. Welty)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: X-29
Message-ID: <8611130630.AA20133@cieunix.rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 13-Nov-86 01:30:48 EST
Article-I.D.: cieunix.8611130630.AA20133
Posted: Thu Nov 13 01:30:48 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Nov-86 21:20:11 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 16