Article View: sci.space
Article #79Re: Comet Collision
From: Steinn Sigurdsson
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 12:06
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 12:06
41 lines
2670 bytes
2670 bytes
In article <1992Oct28.181745.11840@afit.af.mil> morlan@afit.af.mil (Bruce W. Morlan) writes: rsb@mcc.com (Richard S. Brice) writes: >> >> >There is a greater change of dying from a train wreck or a car accident than >> >getting plowed by the comet. >> >At the macro level, i.e. the interaction of planets, stars and comets, the >universe seems to behave in almost clocklike manner; chance and probability >have only a small role. ^^^^^ >Would anyone care to comment on how probability plays a role in the >future interactions of earth and comet P/S-T and how much of the >script is already written into the clock? Sure. The script is nearly totally written. The Heisenberg uncertainty associated with the objects in question (Earth, comet, Sun, other planets, etc.) is practically 0 over the time frame in question. On the other hand, the _uncertainty_ in the measurements leave much room for surprises. I cannot comment on the measurement errors. Well, there is a bit more to it, for example for comet interactions outgassing can be critical, particularly if the trajectory has a future close encounter predicted with outgassing neglected. A very small delta v at perihelion for very high eccentricity orbits can produce very large phase errors a hundred orbits later. With our current knowledge outgassing is unpredictable, I suspect it is a critical phenomenon and is intrinsically unpredictable, eg the cracking of crust due to superheated pockets of volatiles may literally depend on the radioactive decay of C-14 better, the exact time cracking may in principle be triggered by the decay of a single atom, for small enough pockets of gas ;-) So, wenting of gas and resulting delta v may be quantum mechanically uncertain at some level significant macroscopically... * Steinn Sigurdsson Lick Observatory * * steinly@lick.ucsc.edu "standard disclaimer" * * The laws of gravity are very,very strict * * And you're just bending them for your own benefit - B.B. 1988*
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STEINLY.92Oct28120621@topaz.ucsc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!darkstar!steinlyReferences:
<92300.101858RFLOOD@ESOC.BITNET> <schumach.720245192@convex.convex.com> <1992Oct28.145905.9581@mcc.com> <1992Oct28.181745.11840@afit.af.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!darkstar!steinly From: steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu (Steinn Sigurdsson) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Comet Collision Date: 28 Oct 92 12:06:21 Organization: Lick Observatory/UCO Lines: 42 Message-ID: <STEINLY.92Oct28120621@topaz.ucsc.edu> References: <92300.101858RFLOOD@ESOC.BITNET> <schumach.720245192@convex.convex.com> <1992Oct28.145905.9581@mcc.com> <1992Oct28.181745.11840@afit.af.mil> NNTP-Posting-Host: topaz.ucsc.edu In-reply-to: morlan@afit.af.mil's message of Wed, 28 Oct 1992 18:17:45 GMT